Archive for January 8th, 2014

Us & Them II: Lies, Damned Lies and Harry Anslinger

[ US & Them I – Us & Them II – Us & Them IIIUs & Them IV ]

The man who declared war on weed.

Harry Anslinger.

In 1930, in recognition of his headline-worthy service to the Bureau of Prohibition (and as a result of a string of suspcious scandals in the department) Henry Jacob Anslinger was made Commissioner of the newly-formed Federal Bureau of Narcotics, with a brief to enforce the Harrison Act (which had regulated cocaine and opiate usage, largely as a quality control measure aimed at quack doctors and snake-oil peddlars). Alcohol Prohibition was already failing by that time, and the Harrison Act really didn’t generate a whole lot of newsworthy arrests, because people didn’t break it all that much. Harry Anslinger was a very ambitious man, and saw himself as a rival to the legendary J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI. For that to happen, Anslinger would need an adversary as headline-grabbing as the Mob, and the FBN simply didn’t have one. So Harry Anslinger went out and made himself one.

In the 1920s and 1930s almost no-one was getting high on cannabis in the US except Mexicans [1], a few Filipinos, and New York intellectuals who’d read some Jung. The American Medical Association used cannabis in a number of medical remedies, which according to the 1937 evidence of the AMA’s Doctor Woodward totalled about a third of those on the register: bear in mind that to this day, cannabis carries a Schedule 1 prohibtion, which defines it as ‘without recognised medical use’. Why did Anslinger pick such an obscure target? Well, he knew a guy who really, really didn’t like Mexicans.

Continue reading ‘Us & Them II: Lies, Damned Lies and Harry Anslinger’

Advertisements

January 2014
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Per Argument Ad Astra

Politics, history, economics and rampant speculation from a victim of the Great Recession, currently at large in the West Midlands.

"When the regulation, therefore, is in favour of the workmen, it is always just and equitable; but it is sometimes otherwise when in favour of the masters."
                -- Adam Smith

Advertisements